Corporate Bitcoin Custody Solutions Compared: Coinbase vs BitGo vs Fidelity

Corporate Bitcoin Custody Solutions Compared: Coinbase vs BitGo vs Fidelity

Bitcoin Companies

TL;DR: Coinbase Prime dominates (~70% of public company BTC holdings), but centralized custody limits proof of reserves. BitGo offers multi-sig flexibility. Fidelity brings TradFi credibility. Unchained enables collaborative custody with full verification capability. Your custody choice directly affects your ability to prove holdings.

MicroStrategy trusts Coinbase with $60 billion in Bitcoin. Would you?

Corporate Bitcoin custody isn’t a checkbox decision. Your choice affects insurance, regulatory compliance, proof of reserves, and ultimately whether you can prove to shareholders that the Bitcoin is actually there.

We analyzed SEC filings from 50+ Bitcoin treasury companies to see which custodians they use and why. Here’s what we found.


Key Takeaways

Custodian Market Share Best For Proof of Reserves
Coinbase Prime ~70% Simplicity, liquidity Limited (attestation only)
BitGo ~15% Multi-sig control Good (client key access)
Fidelity ~10% TradFi credibility Limited
Unchained Growing Proof verification Excellent (client controls keys)

Why Custody Matters for Corporate Bitcoin

Corporate custody is fundamentally different from personal custody. The stakes are higher: fiduciary duty, regulatory scrutiny, insurance requirements, and shareholder accountability.

Security Requirements

Requirement What It Means Why It Matters
HSMs Hardware Security Modules for key storage Keys never touch internet-connected devices
Air-gapped signing Signing happens on offline devices Prevents remote attacks
Geographic distribution Keys stored in multiple locations Survives disasters
Multi-signature Multiple keys required to move funds No single point of failure
Approval workflows Multiple people must approve transactions Prevents insider theft

Insurance and Liability

If Bitcoin is stolen, who’s liable? Custodians provide:

  • Crime/theft insurance policies
  • Errors & omissions coverage
  • Clear liability frameworks

Without proper custody, directors could face personal liability.

Proof of Reserves Implications

Your custody choice affects your ability to provide proof:

Custody Model Key Control Proof Capability
Self-custody Company holds all keys ✅ Can sign messages directly
Full custodial Custodian holds all keys ⚠️ Depends on custodian attestation
Collaborative Shared (e.g., 2-of-3) ✅ Client keys enable proof

Critical question: Companies using custodians should ask: Can you provide cryptographic proof of our holdings? If not, reconsider. Learn more about proof of reserves for treasury companies.


Coinbase Prime (Institutional)

Coinbase Prime is the dominant custody solution for public Bitcoin treasury companies. Based on our SEC filing analysis, approximately 70% of public company Bitcoin is held through Coinbase.

Who Uses It

Company Holdings Notes
MicroStrategy ~$60B Largest holder
Tesla ~$1B Remaining BTC position
Marathon Digital Mining output Plus purchased BTC

Pros and Cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Largest, battle-tested custodian Centralized (Coinbase controls keys)
$320M insurance policy Limited proof of reserves capability
Integrated trading platform Premium pricing
US-regulated (state licenses) Single point of failure risk
Public company accountability Clients can’t sign messages

BitGo

BitGo is the leading multi-signature custody provider, popular with companies wanting more control over their keys.

Multi-Sig Architecture Options

Configuration How It Works Use Case
2-of-3 Client + BitGo + backup Standard corporate
3-of-5 More signers required High-security needs
Custom Flexible arrangements Enterprise requirements

Pros and Cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Client holds backup keys More operational complexity
Better proof of reserves Smaller than Coinbase
$250M Lloyd’s insurance Less liquidity for trading
Flexible multi-sig options Requires technical expertise

Fidelity Digital Assets

Fidelity Digital Assets brings traditional finance credibility to crypto custody. Popular with companies that prioritize TradFi relationships.

Who Uses It

Companies choosing Fidelity typically: - Have existing Fidelity brokerage/retirement relationships - Need a “safe” brand name for board approval - Come from traditional finance backgrounds

Pros and Cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
TradFi credibility and compliance Less crypto-native expertise
Familiar to boards/audit committees Smaller crypto operation
Long regulatory track record Less integrated trading
Growing institutional focus Limited proof of reserves

Emerging Options

The custody landscape is evolving. Several alternatives are gaining traction:

Provider Model Key Feature
Anchorage Digital Full custodial Federally chartered crypto bank
Unchained Collaborative (2-of-3) Client controls 2 keys, can prove holdings
Self-custody Full control Companies like River use this

Unchained (Collaborative Custody)

This model deserves special attention for proof-of-reserves-focused companies:

How it works: 2-of-3 multi-sig where client holds 2 keys, Unchained holds 1. Client maintains control AND can prove holdings cryptographically. Best of both worlds.


Comparison Table

Summary comparison of major custody providers:

Provider Security Insurance Proof of Reserves Control
Coinbase Prime ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★☆☆☆ ★★☆☆☆
BitGo ★★★★☆ ★★★★☆ ★★★★☆ ★★★★☆
Fidelity ★★★★☆ ★★★★☆ ★★☆☆☆ ★★☆☆☆
Unchained ★★★★☆ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★★ ★★★★★

How to Choose

The right custody solution depends on your priorities:

Prioritize Simplicity and Liquidity → Coinbase Prime

Best for: Companies that want one-stop-shop custody and trading, are comfortable with centralized custody, and prioritize brand recognition.

Prioritize Control and Flexibility → BitGo

Best for: Companies that want key ownership, need custom multi-sig arrangements, and have operational capability to manage keys.

Prioritize TradFi Credibility → Fidelity

Best for: Companies with existing Fidelity relationships, boards that need a “safe” name, and those prioritizing traditional finance compliance.

Prioritize Proof of Reserves → Unchained or Self-Custody

Best for: Companies that want to prove holdings cryptographically, are comfortable with operational complexity, and prioritize transparency.


Frequently Asked Questions

Can we use multiple custodians?

Yes, and many large holders do. Diversifying custody reduces single-point-of-failure risk. However, it adds operational complexity and may complicate proof of reserves.

What insurance do we need?

Most custodians provide crime/theft coverage. You may want additional directors & officers coverage and cyber insurance. Consult with an insurance broker familiar with crypto.

How does custody affect proof of reserves?

Significantly. Self-custody allows you to sign messages proving ownership. Third-party custody means relying on custodian attestations. If proof of reserves matters to you, prioritize custody solutions that enable it.

What questions should we ask custodians?

# Question Why It Matters
1 How are keys secured? Understand their security model
2 What’s insurance coverage and limits? Know your protection
3 Can you provide proof of reserves? Critical for transparency
4 What happens if you’re hacked? Understand recovery process
5 What’s your disaster recovery? Business continuity

The Bottom Line

Custody is a strategic decision, not just an operational one. Your choice affects security, compliance, and your ability to prove holdings to shareholders.

Coinbase Prime is the safe default, battle-tested and widely used. But companies prioritizing proof of reserves should consider collaborative custody or self-custody options that allow cryptographic verification.

Choose custody that matches your transparency goals, not just your security requirements.


Learn More About These Custody Solutions


Further Reading


See which custody solutions Bitcoin treasury companies use at BitcoinCompanies.co