Best Proof of Reserve Auditors and Tools (2025)

Best Proof of Reserve Auditors and Tools (2025)

Bitcoin Companies 5 min read

47 exchanges now publish proof of reserves. Only a handful use independent auditors.

After FTX collapsed with “customer funds” that didn’t exist, the crypto industry scrambled to prove solvency. Some exchanges hired auditors. Others built dashboards. Most did the bare minimum.

Here’s how to tell the difference—and which auditors and tools actually matter.

TL;DR: For serious PoR, use The Network Firm (auditor) + Merkle tree verification. For DeFi, integrate Chainlink PoR. For Bitcoin-only, consider Hoseki’s real-time verification.

The PoR Audit Landscape

The crypto auditing world changed overnight in November 2022. Before FTX, getting a proof of reserves attestation was relatively straightforward. A handful of accounting firms—led by Armanino—had built practices around verifying crypto holdings.

Then FTX proved that point-in-time attestations mean nothing if a company is actively committing fraud between audits.

The result: Armanino and Mazars both retreated from crypto auditing, leaving a gap that crypto-native firms rushed to fill.

Type Examples Pros Cons
Traditional Firms Mazars, Grant Thornton Established reputation Limited crypto expertise
Crypto-Native The Network Firm Deep blockchain knowledge Smaller, newer
Self-Attestation Most exchanges Fast, cheap No independence

Top Proof of Reserve Auditors

The Network Firm ⭐

Verdict: Best choice for exchanges serious about PoR

The current leader in crypto PoR auditing. The Network Firm took over Kraken’s proof of reserves after Armanino’s exit.

Attribute Details
Specialization Crypto-native, founded for digital assets
Notable clients Kraken
Approach On-chain verification + liability attestation
Best for Exchanges wanting gold-standard verification

Armanino LLP

The pioneer—now mostly out of the game

Armanino built TrustExplorer, a real-time reserve tracking platform, before scaling back post-FTX. They defined the standards most PoR implementations follow today.

  • Status: Limited crypto work
  • Legacy: Created the PoR template
  • Cautionary tale: Was FTX’s auditor

Mazars Group

Traditional accounting, paused crypto work

Worked with Binance and Crypto.com before pausing in December 2022. Their reports were criticized for not verifying liabilities.

  • Status: Paused crypto audits
  • Issue: Proved assets but not that they exceeded debts

Grant Thornton

Traditional “Big 4 adjacent” firm with limited crypto exposure. Not a specialist.

PoR Technology Providers

Beyond auditors, technology can automate verification:

Chainlink PoR Flow

How it works: Chainlink nodes monitor reserve addresses and publish balances on-chain. Smart contracts check these values before allowing mints.

Feature Details
Type On-chain oracle
Best for DeFi, wrapped assets, stablecoins
Integration Smart contract native
Website chain.link/proof-of-reserve

BitGo

Custody provider with built-in PoR capabilities. Institutions using BitGo can generate segregated, verifiable reserve reports.

Best for: Institutional custody clients who want PoR bundled with custody.


Hoseki

Real-time Bitcoin verification—the future of PoR

Addresses the key weakness of traditional PoR: point-in-time snapshots. Hoseki provides continuous verification.

Feature Details
Focus Bitcoin-only
Update frequency Real-time
Best for Bitcoin treasuries, custody

Self-Service PoR Tools

For smaller companies or DIY implementation:

Tool Type Use Case Complexity
Merkle tree generators Liability proofs Medium
Address signing scripts Prove wallet ownership Low
Open-source implementations Reference code High

For technical details, see our guide to Merkle Tree Proof of Reserves.

Evaluating a Proof of Reserve

Not all PoR implementations are equal. Here’s the checklist:

Gold Standard Criteria ✅

Criteria Why It Matters Weight
Third-party attestation Independent verification Critical
Liability inclusion Proves solvency, not just assets Critical
User verification You can check your own balance Important
Frequency Harder to hide short-term fraud Important
On-chain proof Public, verifiable Nice to have

Red Flags 🚩

If you see these, be skeptical:

  • PoR shows only assets (not liabilities)
  • Point-in-time only, no regular updates
  • No third-party involvement
  • Users can’t verify their inclusion
  • Vague methodology

Current PoR Rankings

Based on Nic Carter’s evaluation—the closest thing to an industry standard:

Rank Exchange Highlights
🥇 Kraken Third-party audited, user-verifiable, regular updates
🥈 BitMEX Comprehensive on-chain verification
🥉 OKX Merkle tree with user verification

Cost & Implementation

Planning your PoR budget:

Component Cost Timeline
Third-party audit $50K-$200K/year Quarterly
Merkle tree setup $20K-$50K 2-3 months
Ongoing maintenance $5K-$15K/month Continuous
Real-time monitoring $10K-$30K/month 1-2 months

Costs vary by exchange size and asset diversity.

Choosing the Right Approach

Company Type Recommended Stack
Large exchanges The Network Firm + Merkle tree + on-chain attestation
Medium custodians BitGo custody with built-in PoR
Bitcoin-focused Hoseki real-time + public addresses
DeFi protocols Chainlink PoR in smart contracts

See which companies have verifiable proof of reserves on our Bitcoin Companies Leaderboard. All holdings verified on-chain.